{"created":"2023-05-15T15:44:44.997746+00:00","id":3137,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"045f98d8-7606-468d-8a3e-d0c422822f32"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"3137","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"3137"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:seijo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003137","sets":["1:981:983:748"]},"author_link":["7911","7909","7912","7910"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2012-12","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"221","bibliographicPageEnd":"84","bibliographicPageStart":"98","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"成城文藝"},{"bibliographic_title":"The Seijo Bungei : the Seijo University arts and literature quarterly","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_24":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Among three distinctive types of Japanese writing systems (Kanji, Hiragana and Katakana), a behavioral experiment using 97 university students as subjects implies that Katakana is regarded as most difficult (approximately 90%) followed by Hiragana (10%) for the comprehension. Kanji is easiest to comprehend (100%). This indicates Kanji might be comprehended by accessing semantic recognition directly. On the other hand, Hiragana and Katakana might be comprehended by accessing semantic recognition through phonological recognition with an obligatory subvocalization. However, the subvocalization could occur depending on the familiarity or difficulty of stimuli. I also conclude that the subvocalization includes shallow to deep ones depending on the three Japanese writing systems. In addition, interpreters and translators should avoid using Katakana words as much as possible in order for both their listeners and readers to ease their cognitive workload for understanding the meanings of the words.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Among three distinctive types of Japanese writing systems (Kanji, Hiragana and Katakana), a behavioral experiment using 97 university students as subjects implies that Katakana is regarded as most difficult (approximately 90%) followed by Hiragana (10%) for the comprehension. Kanji is easiest to comprehend (100%). This indicates Kanji might be comprehended by accessing semantic recognition directly. On the other hand, Hiragana and Katakana might be comprehended by accessing semantic recognition through phonological recognition with an obligatory subvocalization. However, the subvocalization could occur depending on the familiarity or difficulty of stimuli. I also conclude that the subvocalization includes shallow to deep ones depending on the three Japanese writing systems. In addition, interpreters and translators should avoid using Katakana words as much as possible in order for both their listeners and readers to ease their cognitive workload for understanding the meanings of the words.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7911","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"SHINOZUKA, Katsumasa"}]},{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7912","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"KUBOTA, Mikio"}]}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"成城大学"}]},"item_10002_relation_12":{"attribute_name":"論文ID（NAID）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"110009591110","subitem_relation_type_select":"NAID"}}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00127552","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"02865718","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"篠塚, 勝正"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7909","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"窪田, 三喜夫"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7910","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2014-08-18"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"y061-075.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"411.6 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"y061-075","url":"https://seijo.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/3137/files/y061-075.pdf"},"version_id":"f9d26782-cd55-408f-a012-e5b21116dc8c"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"日本語文字形態_(漢字、ひらがな、カタカナ)","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"2重アクセスモデル","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"認知負荷","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ワーキングメモリ","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"メンタル・レキシコン","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"翻訳","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"日本語文字形態(漢字、ひらがな、カタカナ)による認知言語処理の差異","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"日本語文字形態(漢字、ひらがな、カタカナ)による認知言語処理の差異"},{"subitem_title":"Differences of Japanese Cognitive Language Processing Based on the Three Different Japanese Writing Systems (Kanji, Hiragana and Katakana)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["748"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2014-08-18"},"publish_date":"2014-08-18","publish_status":"0","recid":"3137","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["日本語文字形態(漢字、ひらがな、カタカナ)による認知言語処理の差異"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T13:24:16.557179+00:00"}