@article{oai:seijo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003276,
 author = {後藤, 将之},
 journal = {コミュニケーション紀要},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), A small CSCW (Computer Supported Cooperative Work) system was constructed, based on Microsoft's OneNote software's notebook sharing function, in order to facilitate students' participation to discussion and decision-making process in classroom seminars. Operational experiments were conducted in the author's sophomore seminar classes twice in 2013, using mostly the same equipment as last year's experimentation. Due to some resource limitations, "one PC for one student" situation was not realized again this year, but students' active participations were generally greatly facilitated, with the same pretty positive user-responses obtained after the experiments. To repeat, the author's point is that in some social settings like undergraduate level seminars where everyone knows every other, certain anonymous situation is rather suitable for accelerating careful and self-and-other-oriented student's participation into discussion, because it can reduce social pressure that accompanies saying something in front of the acquaintance. In this operational experimentation too, certain facilitation of discussion among students was clearly observed, with active interchanges among members, although no definite conclusion or decision-making was achieved in this limited time period (one session for 30 or 40 minutes). Further operational experimentation seems needed for more detailed examination of conditions that can lead to decision-making among participants in classroom discussions., A small CSCW (Computer Supported Cooperative Work) system was constructed, based on Microsoft's OneNote software's notebook sharing function, in order to facilitate students' participation to discussion and decision-making process in classroom seminars. Operational experiments were conducted in the author's sophomore seminar classes twice in 2013, using mostly the same equipment as last year's experimentation. Due to some resource limitations, "one PC for one student" situation was not realized again this year, but students' active participations were generally greatly facilitated, with the same pretty positive user-responses obtained after the experiments. To repeat, the author's point is that in some social settings like undergraduate level seminars where everyone knows every other, certain anonymous situation is rather suitable for accelerating careful and self-and-other-oriented student's participation into discussion, because it can reduce social pressure that accompanies saying something in front of the acquaintance. In this operational experimentation too, certain facilitation of discussion among students was clearly observed, with active interchanges among members, although no definite conclusion or decision-making was achieved in this limited time period (one session for 30 or 40 minutes). Further operational experimentation seems needed for more detailed examination of conditions that can lead to decision-making among participants in classroom discussions.},
 pages = {85--95},
 title = {討議・意志決定支援のための小規模デジタルCSCWシステムの運用実験 : 中間報告2-教室内での匿名条件下での討議と意思決定の促進},
 volume = {25},
 year = {2014}
}